« Republican Party: Stabbing Rightward | Main | Radical Right Radically Misunderstands the Filibuster »
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
Woman suffrage -- Because Men Wanted to Be Lazy
I have seen this type of post floating around on neo-con blogs for the last several days and it has to do with the following quote and how it is the outline for the grand plan of the Democratic Party.
Corrupt the young, get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial, destroy their ruggedness. Get control of all means of publicity and thereby: Get the peoples' mind off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books and plays, and other trivialities. Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance. Destroy the peoples faith in their natural leaders by holding up the latter to ridicule, contempt and obloquy. Always preach true democracy but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible. Encourage government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce fear with rising prices, inflation and general discontent. Foment unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorders and foster a soft and lenient attitude on the part of government towards such disorders. By specious argument cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues: honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness. Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with the view of confiscating them and leaving the population defenseless. ... Vladimir Ilich Lenin
And well it is truly amazing where the neo-cons seem to be taking this.......
This must be the "mission statement" for the Democratic Party and especially the power brokers of the far left.
Anyway this reich winger thinks that the movement for women's suffrage was born out of men wanting to be lazy or at the least we helped advance it because we wanted to be lazy........
I am particularly taken with the phrase "destroy their ruggedness," as this has been one of this woman's pet peeves almost from the beginnings of the women's movement in the early seventies. The schools, the media and political correctness have combined in our culture to produce an entire generation of wimps and turning many of the earlier "baby boomer" generation into what is generously called today the "metro sexual." The woman's movement was the biggest boon to the lazy and irresponsible man ever to come down the pike. Suddenly men no longer had to worry about being the "main provider" for their family, suddenly the idea of being the "protector" took on a nasty connotation. Oh it started with the little things like some women taking offense at having a door opened for them or a chair pulled out ... innocuous it would seem, but men became confused and befuddled. Should they or shouldn't they? Eventually they took the easy way and didn't.
Boy, I'm glad Susan B. Anthony fought to allow this neo-con to have the right to vote. She goes on to state smacking your kids around should probably be a constitutional amendment.........
We call in cops to handcuff 5 year olds or to taser 7 year olds because good old-fashioned discipline is now considered abuse.
Aaaahhhh, the good ole' days of belting little Jimmy around the house for getting a C in history class. Geez where did all the good times go? And last but not least this Re-pubic-an thinks the media doesn't report enough on the ruff and tumble side of GWB.........
I can't even begin to estimate the number of times I've heard news media types complaining about having to hike the hills and deal with the President clearing brush and doing "manly" things on his ranch in Crawford, TX. Ruggedness is definitely not high on the media's list.
WOW, all of this from a quote by Lenin. I'll tell ya, if I ever find this Lenin guy I'm gonna shake his hand because he really brings out the best and brightest in these neo-con, reich wing fanatic groups!
P.S. Any of you neo-con men even start in on "see they pick on women" crap I must remind you that this neo-con girl thinks your lazy!!!
Now get back to work!!!
UPDATE: Thanks to a little research by the first commentor on this post we come to find out that this whole rant by this rightie is based on COMPLETELY FALSE information. Thanks manojar!
Fundamentally Right has it all wrong too! But wouldn't you know it Jay over at Stop the ACLU gave the post based on false information a glowing review (from the comments area of the post)!
Jay- I must say, now that I've read the entire article and followed the links...this was very well researched and very impressive! Awesome job! Very interesting what the link about Jesus and self defense had to say too.
WOW Jay, it was very well researched? Hey maybe you could get this guy to write on Stop the ACLU, he should fit right in! Or prying1 how about you? You seemed to like the post too! Can he write on your site?
prying1- Thanks for this piece of the truth. I'm going to blog on your blog and hopefully send people here for the full taxt of your message.
Good when they get done reading the propaganda on your site they can go to Fundamentally Rights site and read some more lies.
Man, Eddie make sure the lies get spread far and wide! We need more people like you spreading the word.
Eddie- That was an excellent post, very well thought out and researched (as prior praise has already made clear). If we can spread this message to more and more Americans, we can start repairing the damage the ACLU and its allies have inflicted upon our nation and its very foundations. Please keep blogging!
But what about the damage your inflicting by the lies that you spread Eddie? Do those trump the supposed lies of the ACLU?
Posted by The Bastard at 03:33 AM in Right Wing Nut | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2454365
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Woman suffrage -- Because Men Wanted to Be Lazy:
Comments
I wonder if Lenin really did say these things!!
Posted by: Manoj | Apr 26, 2005 4:55:25 AM
Sorry I wrote that comment before checking it out. He never did say those.
http://www.snopes.com/language/document/commrule.htm
Posted by: Manoj | Apr 26, 2005 4:57:45 AM
Well, I forgot the website, it was something called crazy republican speeches. Apparently their are some elements with in the GOP that blames the moral decay on women. The argument was ever since women gain rights, men were no longer required to take care of them. The women become independent and no longer need the man for support. The radical elements with GOP say if the women is dependent on the man for all of her needs, Then moral decay will stop.
However the GOP party is morally decay themselves. When GOP supports Iraqi prison abuse, you have to fucked up in the head to support forced homosexuality between iraqi men.
You also have to fucked up in the head when GOP men say lesbians are getting out of hand, have you seen some these republican spokemen for the issue, lesbians are out of hand, lesbians rampart in OK school system. If I was women, I would'nt open my legs for a guy that look like these GOP spokeperson for out of control lesbians.
Personally I think these GOP spokemen just want to have sex with a beautiful girl, but can't becuase they are chasing women that are not in the league. The sexually deprived GOP men who can't laid with any women, blame their lack of sexual activity on the lesbians, has ever occured to you GOP men that the women you want, just don't find you attractive enough to have sex with.
Posted by: Elijah | Apr 26, 2005 10:33:39 AM
Elijah,
Did you read the post? Where are you going with this?
A) The post was about her take on a Lenin quote and how they apply it to Democratic values.
B) It is a false quote, made up! Fabricated!
And in the future please refrain from using the site as a sounding board for sexual frustration, although, if we cover the topic by all means weigh in!
Posted by: The Bastard | Apr 26, 2005 11:17:51 AM
Well, this is the Big Lie technique, more blatant than ever. I saw that same quote at Fundamentally Right. I just assumed it was a real Lenin quote, since you can take anything out of context and put a different spin on it, etc.
But the quote isn't even real?! That figures. These people are desperate.
Posted by: tomharper | Apr 26, 2005 11:35:14 AM
Yet people believe these quotes and use them to base their idealogy on...and <b>they</b> refer to us moonbats or loony liberals?!
Posted by: sally | Apr 26, 2005 4:54:20 PM
Bastard I read the post, I just wanted to throw some other issues in the mix. I will refrain from using the site as a sounding board for sexual frustration.
Posted by: Elijah | Apr 26, 2005 5:16:20 PM
Please refrain, Elijah.
Anybody who reads Jay, let alone believes him, is kind of sick--and that's being nice.
Jay has taken certain elements from history and distorted them to such an extent that they become the opposite of truth or history.
It's beginning to really bug me about how they can make fun of us; call us out of touch with reality, etc.
Yet they feel free to attack with venom. Guess when you have God on your side you can see anything you want to, and not care about who you hurt.
I exclude Hammer from this because he honestly tries to understand how other people think, and he's never venomous--at least I don't find him so.
Posted by: pia | Apr 26, 2005 7:05:20 PM
Got so into that I forgot my point. Of course Lenin did write it. When he met with Marx for their meeting in London.
Know this for a fact because a tour guide on a Jack the Ripper tour once told me so. When I told him he meant Trotsky, became very angry--that I a mere girl--knew history better than he did.
That's Trotsky and Lenin--not Trotsky and Marx.
Posted by: pia | Apr 26, 2005 7:11:11 PM
"I have seen this type of post floating around on neo-con blogs for the last several days and it has to do with the following quote and how it is the outline for the grand plan of the Democratic Party."
It appears that you didn't read my post, if you did you lack the understanding to comprehend it..
I posted the Lenin "quote" to parallel the goals of the communist to those of the communist rooted ACLU.
I don't believe I even mentioned the Dems or the Libs.
If Lenin didn't make the statement that I quoted, it was an honest mistake.. I think it's about time for you to head over to your PEST meeting, you need someone to talk you down..
Posted by: Brad | Apr 26, 2005 8:42:19 PM
Brad, anytime you promote Jay's site you scream "I hate freedom" and just the fact that he endorsed you on your claim that was based on false info goes to show he lacks any clear expertise on the subject. Thanks for playing!
Posted by: The Bastard | Apr 26, 2005 10:06:39 PM
Um, Elija, which GOP members support(ed) Iraqi prison abuse of the sort that you mention? As far as I know, no one supported it. It was investigated, it was prosecuted, and it's prosecution was supported by everybody, as far as I am aware of. Perhaps you have other information.
Posted by: Craig R. Harmon | Apr 28, 2005 1:30:31 AM