« Two passings | Main | Al Franken Defends His New Book »
Tuesday, October 25, 2005
New Video: 2000
Click image to play. Please note that this is a 7 meg file and will take approximately 2 minutes to download with a high speed connection. But don't let this discourage you from watching, this is a MUST see! And make sure your volume is up.
Posted by The Bastard at 06:39 PM in Video and Animation | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834584be369e200d834252f3853ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Video: 2000:
» Under The Radar from fatcat politics
A presentation from "Bring It On! of a powerful statement of where we are in the reality of the world that Bush has created. Sigh... Torture, Treason, Corruption, Lies and Incompetence... By their works you shall know... The Republicans 2000 - 2008 [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 4, 2005 12:14:42 AM
» Did You Ever Wonder What 2000 Looks Like? from Night Bird's Fountain
A Presenatation by BRING IT ON! [Read More]
Tracked on Oct 10, 2005 11:16:08 AM
Comments
This is AMAZING.
Chills down my arms.
Posted by: MoxieGrrrl | Sep 30, 2005 6:30:36 PM
Nicely done, you Bastard. Keep up the great work.
Posted by: Brad | Sep 30, 2005 7:01:30 PM
Excellent. A must-see.
Posted by: Tom Harper | Sep 30, 2005 9:13:55 PM
Wrong Bastard! Did you ASK a single one of the 2000 killed or the 100,000 plus still over there if you could use there pictures? Did you ask the Clinton administration whom all believed "THE LIES" why they were so wrong? Did you ask the United Nations whom believed all "The LIES" why they voted to remove "Saddam".
Last but not least is the only "LIE" is the "LIE" within YOURSELF Mr. B.
Moxie, Brad, and Tom R.I.P. you are fighting a losing cause NOT OUR SOLDIERS!
Posted by: Treason | Sep 30, 2005 10:19:15 PM
Wow again! Great work Bastard!
Posted by: Jersey McJones | Sep 30, 2005 10:43:35 PM
Oh PLEASE, treason...
Did anyone ask Terri Schiavo if they could plaster her sad face all over THEIR websites?
Until right-wingers stop doing the same damn thing, go try using that stupid arguement somewhere else.
Posted by: MoxieGrrrl | Sep 30, 2005 11:18:05 PM
PS: Is that RIP some kind of threat? Just asking for clarification.
Posted by: MoxieGrrrl | Sep 30, 2005 11:19:33 PM
Ughhh, Treason, public access? Look it up.
And the Clinton thing, please. Bush Sr. should have finished this war years ago but he was just as stupid as his son, shit, what goes around comes around!!!!
Or in other words, shit doesn't fall far from the ass!!
These men are dead on the lies presented. Give me evidence of Iraq involved in 9/11 and I'm with you. Otherwise sit down and shut up!
Posted by: The Bastard | Oct 1, 2005 1:35:53 AM
This is a great video Batard, you should up-load it to putfile.com, or yousendit.com. To spread the message alot faster.
Posted by: john | Oct 1, 2005 4:03:10 AM
cranky and Bastard great video, you guys should upload the video to putfile.com or yousendit.com. So others can view the video that don't know about bring it on. Putfile has a top 50 videos of the week if you get on the top 50 alot more people are going to know this site.
Posted by: john | Oct 1, 2005 4:05:03 AM
Treason : Some basic Maths.
Treason : "Mr. Clinton, did you fuck that woman?"
Clinton : "No."
=
Shame, indecency, semen stains and moral outrage.
Treason : "Mr. Bush, are there WMD in Iraq?"
Bush : "Absolutely, positively."
=
Over 2000 dead Americans, and over 50,000 dead Iraqis.
Are you a religious person Treason? Casue if you are I'd seriously suggest you look deep within yourself when you realise what it means to suggest infidelity is worse than mass murder.
Posted by: truelies | Oct 1, 2005 6:29:38 AM
mr. treason:
i don't think these men and women care any longer whether or not permission was asked. closer to your side of things, has anyone asked their permission when their photos or memories are invoked in support of the war?
to keep this simple, let's just say Clinton and the UN believed the same lies, and promulgated them. the only point worth mentioning is that they did not send people to die on behalf of those lies, and did not continue to send people to their deaths once the lies were exposed for what they are.
and by the way, did any of the people you support ask the Iraqis for permission to bomb the living fuck out of their country, invade it, turn it into a guerrilla-training theater and kill and maim an uncountable number of their men, women and children.
and then have the whatever to continue doing it for years, and with no evidence whatsoever of any positive outcomes, all based on the supposed need for some ill-defined "terror war" and this deadly nonsense about staying the course?
i'm really tempted to call you nasty names. i don't know why i hold back . . . seize on that if you bother to reply, because the rest of your point is indefensible.
do you realize your support is helping to kill people? are you aware that you cannot think, but only follow?
Posted by: fortycalibernap | Oct 1, 2005 6:56:53 AM
Fortycali took my comment. MR. Clinton did not sign off on the use of massive force because he understood the cost of "regieme change" by military force is not worth it in this case. So while it is fair to say he believed that Saddam Hussein should be removed from power by the Iraqis, he did not believe we should invade the country without UN authority.
Mr. Clinton also did not engineer evidence to support his position and discard any evidence (or person) who disagreed with the offical position - We must invade Iraq. Even today your PResident insists on linking it to 9/11 in an obvious attempt to get people with small brains (ahem) to by into a reason to lose the folks in that picture.
Our guys are doing a great job, to bad our government isn't.
Posted by: The Cranky Liberal | Oct 1, 2005 10:53:27 AM
Wow, I almost wish in a sense that I hadn't seen this one. It was great! But with my son there it is just too much. I think that this needs to be a TV spot. I am sure that there has to be some way to raise the money to run it. If it is though, at the end it needs to say IMPEACH!! Thanks so much. Right now I am so sick of seeing his disaster photo ops that I can't even watch the news any more. I was looking at the news yesterday and just to cover the stuff that has happened in the past week would take a week to write. Sorry for rambling.
Posted by: JC | Oct 1, 2005 11:12:43 AM
This is why we are at war for all you loose minded bandits:
President Bush:
Thursday September 27,2005
"The terrorists saw our response to the hostage crisis in Iran, the bombings in the Marine barracks in Lebanon, the first World Trade Center attack, the killing of American soldiers in Somalia, the destruction of two U.S. embassies in Africa and the attack on the USS Cole," Bush noted, after getting an update on the war on terror at the Pentagon.
"The terrorists concluded that we lacked the courage and character to defend ourselves and so they attacked us," the president added, in quotes picked up by United Press International.
Four of the six terrorist attacks cited by Bush took place on Clinton's watch, with the first two coming during the presidencies of Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan.
Hmmmm. Short memories you people have.
Posted by: Treason | Oct 1, 2005 2:32:19 PM
To Treason:
The problem here is that you are trying to reason with people with some extremist thought processes. They don't care what we think or what the other half of America thinks. We're all a bunch of idiots in their minds. They have a one-sided view of Bush and that's that. There is no middle ground or even a positive thought with the man in their eyes. That's heartbreaking. Personally I don't think any of the authors on this site are idiots. Some of their readers, well maybe but an extremist is not going to come back to the center or even lean slightly our way. Not gonna happen with these folks. The only hope is that more of us stop in and point out things to them. Sometimes though, there really is no sense in arguing because there will be no victory with them.
Moxie is correct on the usage of the pictures but I wonder if Roger Waters and David Gilmore know they reproduced a Pink Floyd song for a political message. Seems the Boss was pretty pissed when Reagan's Campaign used "Born in the USA" for obvious reasons... Imagine if it were a Metallica song and Lars knew about it. We'd have to hear that whiny runt talk about it.
Bastard:
You are obviously a highly intelligent and skilled person. Same with you Cranky since your name is on the movie. The movie does nothing however to advance your goals but only points out what has happened. There is no change only in the matter of wanting Bush out. We're a Democracy and it is an inevitablity that change will occur in this country if it gets too far out of whack one way or another. You are just promoting criticism and that's it.
What your video doesn't point out is which of the dead soldiers re-enlisted knowing full well the war was either coming or ongoing. It sucks when anyone has to die this way, in a war. But I feel your video makes out that these people died in vein or are all dead anti-war people who didn't want to be there.
Posted by: steve | Oct 1, 2005 4:28:33 PM
Found the vid on a tip from Moxie Grrrl. Will be linking up - nice job!
Those that are angered by the video maker would do well to place that anger toward the persons responsible for putting our troops in harms way.
Ironically, 2K is the year that this madness all started with a stolen election.
Posted by: windspike | Oct 1, 2005 4:34:13 PM
Moxie said: "PS: Is that RIP some kind of threat? Just asking for clarification."
No Moxie that would not be a threat. It's a blog for Christ sake. Smile, your an outstanding person doing what you believe in no different then I. Just two different points of view. And yes, I do respect your opinion no matter how warped it is. Please keep on making me think and laugh.
Posted by: Treason | Oct 1, 2005 5:08:49 PM
Windspike, still crying over an election that was won fair and square I can see. That's your first problem and if you can't get over that then there is no help for you with any other issue. And I'm not angered at the film maker. It just disgusts me that he/she takes advantage of people whom believe in what they are fighting for. If they didn't believe in what they were fighting for they never would have signed up in the first place. If they didn't believe in what they were fighting for then they would have found a way out of fighting.
Posted by: Treason | Oct 1, 2005 5:13:12 PM
Moxie, it was wrong for them to blast Terry Schiavo's picture all over there web sites. Just as it was wrong to hold a special session of congress over the issue. No, I don't believe in everything my party does.
Posted by: Treason | Oct 1, 2005 5:15:30 PM
“Treason” you bring up "the killing of American soldiers in Somalia" This is a short summary of the troops got to Somalia. Clinton did not send them there. Bush Sr sent them there. Second of all while Clinton was in office it was the republicans who were pushing to get them out. Thirdly, when Clinton send the troops back to Somalia? The GOP house opposed. So therefore, I find out how the GOP party today is the self proclaimed party of wariorrs, but the 1990s the GOP was the party of cowards.
The United Nations suspended its efforts at famine relief because of thievery and fighting. In late 1992, President George Bush sent 25,000 U.S. troops to Somalia for the express purpose of assuring the delivery of U.N. food, medicine and other supplies. http://www.netnomad.com/somcia.html
Statement of Republican Policy on U.S. Armed Forces in Somalia, Adopted April 1, 1993
U.S. military forces in Somalia have fulfilled the mission given them by President Bush. Republicans therefore call on President Clinton to bring our troops home.
The United States has a proud tradition of providing international humanitarian assistance to those truly in need. Somalia is a case in point. In the early 1980's, and again in the early 1990s, the American people and the U.S. Government responded to famine in Somalia by bringing in massive quantities of food and medical assistance.
In the last several months, as anarchy gripped that country and famine again loomed on the horizon, President Bush sent U.S. Armed Forces to Somalia to restore order and permit food to reach the people. He made a commitment to withdraw our troops when the mission was completed and return the operation to the U.N. This process was begun before he left office. The mission has been accomplished, but our troops remain, and it appears President Clinton has no intention of bringing them home. Instead, U.N. bureaucrats who want to keep the United States in Somalia will decide their fate.
Republicans commend our Armed Forces for restoring order to Somalia and for helping to alleviate human suffering in that country. However, we have several deep concerns. Without appropriate congressional consultation, President Clinton has committed thousands of U.S. military personnel to a U.N. peacekeeping operation commanded by a foreign national for an indefinite period of time. Our men and women in uniform will provide both the fighting teeth and the logistical tail for this open-ended operation.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r103:H06OC3-756:
Although no formal decision has yet been made, the Clinton White House is currently contemplating to dispatch a small military force back to Somalia.The United States, which abandoned Somalia last March after 18 Army Rangers were killed in Mogadishu, is reportedly being pressured by other Western powers who want protection for the UN peacekeepers in Somalia who are expected to withdraw from Somalia by March. Britain, France and Italy made commitments to provide security during the pull-out but US Ambassador Daniel Simpson said in Nairobi that no decision has been made regarding a future US military involvement in Somalia. Although the new Republican-controlled Congress may oppose further American involvement in Somalia, the real-politik of getting US troops out of Haiti may require US troops to be redeployed in Somalia as a sign of good faith to other major Western powers. The issue of redeploying US troops in Somalia was also mentioned in a recent edition of the US Army Times.
http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Newsletters/SNU26.html
Posted by: Zero | Oct 1, 2005 6:47:16 PM
For once in your life, "steve", you're absolutely right. Nothing Bush does will ever be good enough for us.
We base this assumption on a full five years now of him fucking up every single thing he has touched. Do we need any more evidence to assume the worst from him?
Posted by: Brad | Oct 1, 2005 7:46:12 PM
Talk about polishing the brass on the Titanic. It doesn't mean people will automatically believe your nonsense, treason, if you just bitch loud enough. Silly stupid troll!
Posted by: Brad | Oct 1, 2005 7:49:04 PM
Treason, apparently our memories are longer than yours.
What part of all those terrorist attacks had anything to do with Iraq? According to congress, the UN, and a CIA report, absolutely nothing. Do you support the murder of American troops regardless of the veracity of their mission? That's what you're saying, "Support the troops!" even when you're sending them to certain death for no good reason. You're not a conservative, your just a moron waving a flag. Since when did being a Republican mean being blind and stupid? You can still be a Republican and use your brain AND support your president AND support your troops. It doesn't mean surrendering your brain and your individuality and independence though. Quite the opposite in fact.
When will conservatives in America wake up and realise that there is nothing "conservative" about irresponsible fiscal policy and massive spending, high domestic and foreign debt levels and overcommitment in foreign warzones? The Bush administration is the most socialist government Amreica has had in a long time. The only thing missing is the complete descent into fascism, but with poster boys like Steve and Treason it won't take long.
One nation, one people, one flag!
Posted by: truelies | Oct 1, 2005 10:52:47 PM
That's amazing Bastard, it really was. It brought tears to my eyes seeing all of those folks and even more tears when I found out it was only 500 of them. I swear to God that we should all go up to Washington DC and plant 1935 crosses out in front of the White House. I wonder how many bombs Bush would order dropped on us?
Treason: Go back to the shadows where you belong. Go back tReturn to your place in hell at the foot of your master's throne where you can await his return. He will return in 2009, when he is finished desecrating the White House.
Posted by: Joseph (Ok Liberal) | Oct 1, 2005 11:05:18 PM
