« Secret - Or Secret Code? | Main | Harriet Miers Questionnaire »
Thursday, October 20, 2005
One Reason Recruitement Is Down
Because some high school kids seem to be smarter than the goverment.
The ad was created and paid for by a Warwick student who is a member of the Bruderhof community, a Christian-based communal order in Sugar Loaf that preaches pacifism.
Posted by The Bastard at 04:02 AM in Sidebar | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834584be369e200d83492064769e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference One Reason Recruitement Is Down:
Comments
Obviously a radical sect that breaks from Jesus's teaching of hatred and open warfare and killing all those who stand in your way!
And a traitor to the nation to for not goosestepping in line with current plans to "liberate" the world....
I hope they expell this kid. When kids start thinking things through and using common sense, we are all doomed.
Posted by: The Cranky Liberal | Oct 20, 2005 10:29:45 AM
You sure are cranky. Biased, too.
Don't forget, Jesus was persecuted by the Romans. He died for our sins - so we don't have to.
Why do you put liberate in quotation marks? You think Iraq or Afghanistan are less free than they were a few years ago? You must be a fool of the highest magnitude.
Why didn't this kid, if he's so smart, realize that 27 million Iraqis' lives and happiness may be worth fighting for?
Posted by: Nicholas | Oct 20, 2005 10:10:06 PM
Every persons life is worth fighting for when you are not lied to!!!! Afghanistan, yes. Iraq, no!
Why?
Because we were lied too!!
It is not the responsibility of these young men and women to invade a sovereign country and impose our will on them.
Remember, Iraq DID NOT attack us on 9/11. None of the hijackers were Iraqi.
Now if we were in the country below Iraq (and not Kuwait) that would be a different story.
And neither countries are liberated. Afghanistan could have been liberated but we got side tracked by Iraq for what?
Please explain for what, it was not for freedom remember, it was for WMD's, then it was for harboring terrorists and then when that didn't pan out for Bushy, then it was for freedom.
Put fucking Bush on a horse and paint his face blue and white and have him trot up and down the line of battle yelling freedom and I think you would have the making of a good movie.
Oh wait, thats been done already!
Posted by: The Bastard | Oct 20, 2005 10:19:48 PM
where is this school? it's cool that they even allowed an ad like that to be placed, paid or not... in my neck of the woods that would be called "disruptive" or "not a positive message for the students" and be denied outright...
Posted by: Pete Bogs | Oct 21, 2005 3:54:33 PM
Google "Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq"
WMDs is only one of many reasons that Congress passed this resolution.
" Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq" was a pretty good reason, no?
al-Zaqawi, the leader of 'al Qaida in Iraq' was specifically mentioned by name prior to the US entering Iraq. That's one of those little facts the leftists like to pretend didn't happen, but that information (plus a whole lot more)is easily verified by anyone. The Democrats know this, and this is why they will take the mootbats money but not their advice.
Posted by: Alger Hiss | Oct 23, 2005 7:13:38 PM
Ummm, Al-Zaqawi was not part of Al-Qaeda when he entered Iraq. He had his own little group and then eventually aligned himself with Al-Qaeda. Go google that, put it in your Republihash pipe and smoke it.
And again, lets just remember, Iraq did not attack us on 9/11. Al-Qaeda did not operate from Iraq prior to 9/11 and lets not forget how many of those hijackers were Saudi Arabia. We invaded the right part of the world it just should have been a little bit south of where we are. So much for global positioning.
Posted by: The Bastard | Oct 23, 2005 9:02:03 PM
