« Bush's Playmate | Main | Google's quote of the day »

Tuesday, December 27, 2005

Herring Anyone?

Over the past couple of months, a great deal of discussion was heard about the war on Christmas. Most of that diatribe came from Faux News and Bill O'Lielly in particular.

I looked long and hard for evidence of this so-called war from avenues outside the Faux News sound machine.  Not so surprisingly, I didn't find a one.  Oh, I found a lot of "a friend of a friend" stuff that typically falls under the category urban legend, but nothing of any merit.

I began to ask myself, "Why all the fuss over a non-issue?"  Sure, I can see the ultra-religious right trying to make it into a big hoopla to raise their status at this time of year.  But why would O'Lielly allow himself to be lead like a bull by the nose to this trifle?

Then it came to me.  This whole thing was a red-herring.  A distraction from other important issues. 

There are many that I could talk about, but today I'm just going to mention one.  A very important one, in my eyes.

Christmas is a time of family.  A time when families get together and share their love and think of all the great times they had during the year.  If the year has been a sad one, it's a time for families to plan for a better future.

Many families devastated by Katrina didn't get to experience that this year.

I'm talking specifically about those families that still don't know where their children are.  Homes can be rebuilt, but missing children can tear a hole in a family's heart.  They don't know if the children are alive or dead.  If alive, they don't know if they are with people who are taking care of them.

As of December 23, 2005, 500 children were still classified as missing in Katrina's aftermath.  Sadly, the very organization that is supposed to be helping the victims of Katrina is prolonging their pain.

Why? The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will not share its evacuee database with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.  FEMA is blaming privacy laws for its lack of co-operation.

The FBI, which is also trying to resolve these cases, has also had trouble getting information from FEMA. 

It's shameful.

One of the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission's Final Report was for government-wide information sharing.  On December 5, 2005 the Commission came out with a report card on how all areas of the government have been doing meeting their recommendations.  The grade for government-wide information sharing?  D.

Some of you might be saying, "Well, the FBI is part of the government so, yeah FEMA should share information with them but the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children isn't.  FEMA was right to withhold information from them. "

You're right and you're wrong.  A look at the mandate and mission for the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children shows that it is a private, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization.  Read a little further, though, and you see that it has congressional mandates.  One of those mandates is to

Provides technical assistance to individuals and law-enforcement agencies in the prevention, investigation, prosecution, and treatment of cases involving missing and exploited children.

The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children can't follow a government mandate if FEMA won't share information.

Not much attention has been given to the 9/11 Commission's Report Card by Faux News.  Faux News tended to deride the report with the fact that we haven't been hit by terrorist inside the United States.  They conveniently forgot that the handling of the aftermath's of Katrina, Rita, and Wilma would have also been improved by better efforts to meet the Commission's recommendations.

So has the so-called war on Christmas been a red-herring?  Ask yourself, what other issues have we heard little about because of this "war"?  What else has our attention be diverted from?  How are things going in the areas of civil rights, economic issues, education, immigration, and the budget to name a few?  Has enough attention been given to these areas?  Or has Faux News and O'Lielly's red herring distracted everyone just like a cat distracted by a waving light?

Crossposted on Can't Keep Quiet!

Posted by Mulligan at 03:52 AM in Current Affairs, Politics | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834584be369e200d8349c97cb69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Herring Anyone?:

Comments

While I want to agree with you, I think it has highlighted many problems within our country.

I know that much attention has been paid to the 9/11 Commission Report Card in New York.

The initial Christmas tree lighting incident, on December 11, happened less than 30 minutes from Manhattan. We're supposed to be a tolerant wonderful blue state.

The town supervisor was asked to apologize because he made an impromtu speech asking for inclusiveness. He was called "rude." I didn't hear the speech so I don't know.

Is everything that you mentioned more important? Is it a red herring?

I am having a hard time with the entire subject. Personally I would like it to go away.

But the First Amendment is very important to our country. While many people might think that I'm falling into a trap or overreacting, I believe that the Constitution and The First Amendment are the only things that guarantee every American full rights.

I know because I was blogging last Christmas that the "war on Christmas" was fermenting then. Incidences of anti-Semitism have been increasing in the last few years rather dramatically in some areas.

The Coptic Christian family that was killed in Jersey City--had to be killed by Muslims. That they were killed by Christians didn't matter to many people. Actually that was the incident that made me cross the line from a regular blogger to a political one.

We have spent the year listening to people like Dobson and Frist. We know who Bush consulted before making at least one Supreme Court nomination.

I don't like living in a country where hate is fermenting. And it comes from the top.

I see each problem as interconnected. That people give credence to O'Reilly or anybody at Fox makes me sick.

In order to make any good viable changes to our country we must take the power away from the Republicans, and the O'Riley's, Dobson's and Frist's

The Bastard says that religion has begun most wars. I agree but will go a step further. People fear the unkown, they hate what they can't comprehend

Horrible things have happened in this country this year. To make sense out of it all many people turn to faux faith. O'Reilly is pandering to masses of fearful Americans who would rather place blame than solve problems

The Senate voted down The Patriot Act. Michael Brown is a national joke; FEMA must be totally overhauled. Good things are beginning to happen, but we must take back the Congress

It's time to take back America. We have ten months until the 2006 elections and two years ten months until the next presidential election

Posted by: pia | Dec 27, 2005 1:59:16 AM

You know, I'm not sure they are smart enough to try to pull the wool over our eyes about the missing kids with the War on Christmas, but it wouldn't surprise me. Whthere or not it was intentional or not, that network seems to run things that are designed to fire up the base and get them to ignore real issues. The more trouble the president gets in, the louder and more innane the herring issue.

The missing kids are insane though. I mean if it is privacy legislation that is the problem, couldn't our Congress fly backin an emergency session (oh wait they were ALREADY there!) and pass a temporary GulF Coast Family Reunification act and get the right info into the right hands? Seems to make sense to me - how hard could it have been?

But no, those kids are living and breathing (we hope) so fuck em!

Posted by: The Cranky Liberal | Dec 27, 2005 8:43:37 AM

Or Cranky, they are not breathing and the Federal government doesn't want to see the death toll rise. Right now they are just "missing".

Posted by: The Bastard | Dec 27, 2005 9:01:31 AM

If this is an example of compassionate conservatism, God help us.

Posted by: Jet | Dec 27, 2005 12:45:02 PM

Pia,

I feel that the issue of religious intolerance that you bring up is actually one of the things people are distracted from by this "War on Christmas." As far as Faux News and others are concerned, the only people facing intolerance are perfect Christians. By perfect, I mean those that go to the right churches. I go to a Unity Church. Some so-called christian groups consider it a "cult" because we believe that all religions and all cultures are valued. Many aspects of different religions have been incorporated into our services. What we don't believe in is dogma. Dogma was created by man.

BTW, I had a friend that I had known since elementary school quit talking to me because I joined a Unity church. We had been best friends growing up and into our adulthood until that day. I knew she could be intolerant, but until then, I didn't realize just how intolerant of her idea of "unaccepted religions" she was.

I also agree that some areas are less prone to buy into the "War on Christmas" red herring. New York is a prime example since it has had direct example of what can happen when we turn our attention away from what's important.

Posted by: mulligan | Dec 27, 2005 1:15:15 PM

I agree, the War on Christmas has been a red herring; unfortunately a very successful one. There weren't any runaway brides or missing debutantes to fill up the news, so the wingnuts had to invent something.

Posted by: Tom Harper | Dec 27, 2005 1:19:48 PM

As far as I can tell, the "Happy Holidays" vs "Merry Christmas" war began with big retailers, who are struggling with the rise of the radical religious right and the radicalization of the atheist left. These internal struggles spilled over into the punditsphere and now has become a political bicker. I think it sad that politicians and company officials feel the need to choose between using "Christmas" and "Holiday" in their choice of greetings. Is it possible that the absolute freedom of free trade and out of control capitalism is now being tempered by out of control religious animosity? It would seem so to this writer.

Posted by: Joseph (Lionhearted Liberal) | Dec 27, 2005 3:24:26 PM

Thing is, if they were going to all the trouble to invent something - why invent something with an automatic expiration date of December 26th?

Frankly I think O'Reilly and Fox were just after what all media is after - ratings ratings ratings.

The problems with trying to write it off as a red herring is that then you're disregarding people like Hans. Remember Hans? I would love it if that guy was a troll but I'm really afraid that he was real. People like that have been out there, are out there, and will be out there long after Bush has ridden off into the sunset. So will bureaucratic ineptitude. So will corruption. The bad side of human nature has a lot of angles - picking one or two of those darker facets and trying to brush off the rest as somehow just being smoke & mirrors seems to me like a dangerous oversimplification of the overall situation.

Yes, we should remember Katrina (not to mention the other disasters that we've seen lately - our short attention span for the disaster just before disaster-of-the-month is sort of doesn't reflect well on us, suppose you could blame the media for not sticking with topics for long, but it is called "news", not "olds" - and the for-profit media just gives us what they think we want); yes, we should demand efficiency, ethical standards, honesty, fairness, and all that good stuff from the government we pay for; but we should also not let the kind of poison people like Hans (or Falwell, to a lesser but still quite noxious degree) spew go unchallenged either. I don't think it's safe to just write that stuff off.

Aside from that, the problem with conspiracy theorizing - which is the label I'm afraid I stick on things like making accusations like this without offering any actual evidence - is that it sets the theorizer up to not be taken seriously. Everybody beats up on Bush for not bothering with proof - might be more effective if we held ourselves to higher standards.

Otherwise it's all just a shouting match, and do those ever do anybody any good?

Posted by: bonnie | Dec 27, 2005 5:44:07 PM

I am wondering what OReilly, Fox News and FEMA have to do with US foreign policy, Mulligan. Ya drew me here from your last post. I just don't get it all. I don't think Fox News runs this country... (iPods do! :))

I am sorry, I live in a world where religion and politics don't have any effect on my life in any way. So does the majority of America.

Pia says something interesting noting the times of the next elections. Now I know most of BIO's authors and readers are probably going after Republicans but why not everyone. If we have to blame our politicians on stuff, I think it is a wasted effort if you target one party. There are some Democrats that don't need their jobs either. Ted Kennedy for one. How about Kerry for that matter? Using his military experience and subsequent protest work after his tour of duty as a political motive to be against the Iraq War which has no similarities whatsoever, is almost shameful! You'd have to admit there are some corrupted people in the Democratic Party... Howard Dean anyone?

Posted by: steve | Dec 27, 2005 6:04:35 PM

steve,

On my other post you and Francis were saying how wonderful everything was for ev everyone under Bush. This post points out how it's not so great.

Posted by: mulligan | Dec 27, 2005 9:59:03 PM

Yeah, I know where you are going with that one...

I don't just defend Bush because I like the guy. I think he is doing a great job. Now I know I can be verbally assaulted on this blog for saying that but so what, I think I am right. What a stressful time to be a President! Who could say that someone else would be better? Kerry or Gore could have been ripped to shreds right now! Who the hell knows? Anyone ever think the problems may be in Congress?

Posted by: steve | Dec 27, 2005 11:18:12 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.